Why Most SEBI Regulations Help Big Players, Not Retail Investors

Introduction: Are SEBI Regulations Really Retail-Friendly?

SEBI, India’s stock market regulator, exists to protect investors and ensure fair trading. Over the years, it has introduced several rules to stop scams, improve transparency, and build investor trust.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth—many SEBI regulations end up helping big players more than retail investors.

On paper, these rules aim to “level the playing field.” In reality, they often tilt the advantage toward large institutions—like foreign portfolio investors (FPIs), anchor investors, and well-funded algo traders.

Retail investors, meanwhile, face stricter restrictions, tighter compliance, and fewer opportunities. Ironically, most of these rules were created to protect them.

Let’s take examples. F&O rules have made it harder for retail traders to participate. Algo trading approvals are so complex that only institutions can keep up. FPIs enjoy easier access, and co-location services continue to give speed advantages to select brokers.

This blog breaks it down:

• Which SEBI regulations favor large players
• How recent rule changes impact retail investors
• Real cases and data showing the growing imbalance
• What SEBI can do to truly empower small investors

Because protecting retail traders shouldn’t mean pushing them out of the game.

F&O Regulations: Disproportionate Impact on Retail Traders

SEBI has introduced multiple rules to reduce the risks in Futures and Options (F&O) trading. On the surface, these steps aim to protect retail investors. But in practice, they’ve made it harder for small traders to participate.

Let’s break it down.

What Changed?

• SEBI increased the lot size in many contracts.
• Weekly expiry options got limited to one expiry per exchange.
• New disclosures were mandated for F&O traders.

What Happened Next?

Retail participation took a hit. According to SEBI’s own study, over 90% of retail traders lose money in F&O trading. SEBI used this data to justify tighter rules—but the fallout was uneven.

Retail traders, who often trade small positions, found it difficult to adjust. The increased margin and lot size raised the capital needed to trade.

Big institutions didn’t feel the pinch. They already have the capital, tools, and teams to manage risk better. For them, the rules simply pushed smaller players out of the way.

Real Impact:

• Zerodha CEO Nithin Kamath said these restrictions have led to a 20% drop in retail F&O participation.
• Many traders shifted to riskier products or unregulated platforms.

Bottom Line:

SEBI’s F&O reforms may reduce losses for some—but they also limit access for many retail investors. The changes didn’t hurt institutional players, but they shrank the space for individuals trying to trade responsibly.

Algo Trading Regulations: Leveling the Field or Raising Barriers?

In 2022, SEBI decided to regulate algo trading—a fast, automated way of placing trades using software. The goal was to prevent misuse and ensure fairness. But in the process, the rules made it harder for retail investors to participate.

What SEBI Did:

• It made registration mandatory for algo providers.
• Every algorithm must now get pre-approval before going live.
• Platforms offering APIs (for automated trading) must follow strict protocols.

What This Means for Retail Investors:

Most retail traders don’t have tech teams or compliance departments. These rules made algo trading too complex and expensive for them.

Before the regulation, many tech-savvy individuals used platforms like Zerodha, Dhan, and Fyers to run basic algos. After SEBI’s crackdown, most brokers pulled back from offering retail algo access altogether.

Who Benefits?

Institutions.
Large trading firms already use advanced algo systems. They have legal, technical, and compliance teams to handle approvals. The regulation didn’t slow them down—it protected their advantage.

The Irony:

The rules aimed to stop manipulative algos. But instead of curbing institutional misuse, they ended up locking out small innovators—retail traders who wanted to automate their strategies.

Bottom Line:

SEBI’s algo policy may have good intentions, but in its current form, it builds walls instead of leveling the field. The result? Algo trading becomes a club where only big players are allowed in.

Favorable Treatment for Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs)

While SEBI tightens rules for domestic investors, it has made life easier for foreign players—especially Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs).

These institutions bring big money, and SEBI clearly wants to attract more of it. But in doing so, it may be creating an uneven playing field for Indian retail investors.

What SEBI Did:

• Simplified FPI registration through the Common Application Form
• Allowed onboarding through International Financial Services Centres (IFSC)
• Regularly engages with FPI representatives to rationalize compliance requirements

What This Means:

Big global funds now find it easier to invest in Indian markets. Their process is smoother, faster, and better supported.

Meanwhile, Indian retail investors face growing paperwork—even for basic things like IPO applications or trading in new segments like REITs or InvITs.

The Imbalance:

• FPIs get institutional access, relationship managers, and regulatory hand-holding.
• Retail investors deal with broker limits, margin restrictions, and delays in approvals.

SEBI’s Position:

SEBI has stated that simplifying rules for FPIs encourages long-term capital flow. That may be true—but it shouldn’t come at the cost of ignoring domestic investors.

Bottom Line:

SEBI treats FPIs like valued clients and retail investors like liabilities. That may boost foreign flows, but it undermines confidence in regulatory fairness at home.

Anchor Investor Allocations: A Double-Edged Sword

SEBI recently allowed up to 50% of bond issues to be reserved for anchor investors. On paper, this move adds stability to debt markets. But in practice, it may push retail investors even further to the sidelines.

What Are Anchor Investors?

These are large institutional investors—like mutual funds, insurance companies, and pension funds—who commit money before the public issue opens. Their early participation helps generate confidence and attract more subscriptions.

What Changed?

Earlier, only a portion of the issue was allowed for anchor allocation. Now, SEBI has raised this to as much as 50% for bond issues.

This change is aimed at encouraging participation in lower-rated debt instruments. But there’s a trade-off.

Impact on Retail Investors:

• Less availability of high-yield bonds for retail
• Reduced price discovery, since big players set the tone early
• Retail participation becomes reactive, not proactive

Expert Take:

According to analysts, this move helps underwriters and big investors manage demand risk. But retail investors get only what’s left—often with less time and less return upside.

Bottom Line:

SEBI’s anchor allocation rule boosts institutional comfort—but at the cost of limiting access and opportunity for small investors.

Co-Location and HFT: An Unequal Playing Field

In 2015, the NSE co-location scam exposed one of the most serious cases of unfair advantage in Indian market history. It revealed how some brokers got faster access to price feeds and trading infrastructure—giving them a huge edge over the average investor.

Nearly a decade later, despite regulations, the gap between institutions and retail investors remains wide.

What Is Co-Location?

Co-location allows traders to place their servers physically inside or near the stock exchange’s data center. This cuts latency by microseconds—enough for high-frequency traders (HFTs) to front-run retail orders and react faster to price changes.

Who Benefits?

Big institutions and proprietary trading firms.
They can afford the infrastructure, the speed, and the algorithms. Retail investors? They don’t stand a chance.

SEBI’s Response:

After the NSE scam, SEBI introduced reforms to improve transparency. But critics argue that regulators haven’t fully closed the loopholes. HFTs still dominate volumes, and co-location still exists—just under tighter disclosure.

Impact on Retail:

• Orders get executed slower
• Price slippage increases
• Market feels “rigged” to many small traders

Bottom Line:

SEBI has taken steps, but co-location and HFT still give institutional players a serious edge. For most retail investors, this is a race they can’t even enter—let alone win.

Conclusion: Are We Really Protecting Retail Investors?

SEBI was built to safeguard all investors. But over the past few years, many of its regulations seem to serve institutions more than individuals.

From F&O restrictions that push out small traders, to algo trading norms that favor big tech-backed firms… From co-location speed advantages, to increased anchor investor control, and the red carpet for FPIs—the regulatory environment increasingly feels skewed.

Yes, SEBI has valid reasons: reduce risk, promote transparency, attract foreign capital. But in trying to protect retail investors, SEBI may be limiting their access to opportunity. Worse, it often does so while offering big players more flexibility.

If India wants truly inclusive financial markets, regulations must:

• Encourage education, not just restriction
• Build smarter risk controls, not one-size-fits-all rules
• And most importantly, create access without bias

Because the future of Indian markets doesn’t lie in foreign capital alone—it lies in empowered domestic investors who feel seen, heard, and respected.

Want smart tools that level the field? Trade confidently with Angel One’s research-backed platform—built for real retail investors.

FAQs: SEBI Regulations and Retail Investors

Q1. Why do SEBI regulations often feel biased toward big players?
Because institutions have the capital, tech, and teams to comply easily. Many rules, though well-intentioned, unintentionally raise entry barriers for retail investors.

Q2. Are SEBI’s F&O rules good or bad for retail traders?
They’re designed to reduce retail losses—but also limit participation. Higher lot sizes and expiry restrictions hurt small traders the most.

Q3. Can retail investors use algo trading in India?
It’s technically allowed, but SEBI’s current approval process and compliance needs make it too complex for most individuals.

Q4. What is co-location, and why is it unfair?
Co-location allows institutional traders to place servers near exchange data centers for faster trades—something retail investors can’t access.

Q5. Does SEBI favor foreign investors?
SEBI simplifies compliance and entry for FPIs to attract capital. But this often makes Indian retail investors feel neglected.

Related Articles

Penny Stock Investment in India: High Risk, Higher Reward?