Food Fight: Rapido Takes Aim at Zomato & Swiggy with Cut-Price Commission Model

Introduction: A New Challenger Enters the Arena

Rapido vs Zomato Swiggy: The Indian food delivery landscape has long been a battleground dominated by two behemoths: Zomato and Swiggy. With a combined market share of nearly 100%-the sector has essentially functioned as a duopoly, leaving restaurants and consumers with few alternatives.

But this status quo is now facing a major disruption. In June 2025, Rapido, a well-known bike-taxi and local delivery platform, announced its bold entry into the food delivery business. Unlike its predecessors who tried and failed to shake the duopoly—such as Ola Café and Uber Eats—Rapido is arriving with a radically different proposition: significantly lower commission rates and a simplified, flat delivery fee for customers.

The new entrant promises to charge just 8–15% commission from restaurants, compared to the 16–30% levied by Zomato and Swiggy. With over 700,000 riders and 2.5 million daily orders across its mobility services, Rapido already has the logistics backbone needed to test this model.

As the pilot launch kicks off in Bengaluru by July 2025, the stage is set for a potential upheaval in India’s ₹50,000 crore online food delivery market. This blog will unpack the competitive dynamics, key differentiators, and implications of Rapido vs Zomato Swiggy—a clash that could reshape the way India orders food.

Rapido vs Zomato Swiggy: A Pricing Revolution That Could Reshape Delivery

At the heart of Rapido’s food delivery strategy lies a direct challenge to the most contentious issue in the ecosystem: commission fees.

1. Lower Commission Rates: A Game-Changer for Restaurants

While Zomato and Swiggy currently charge restaurants anywhere between 16% to 30% per order—depending on location, visibility, and order volume—Rapido’s offer of just 8% to 15% represents a potential 50% savings for food businesses.

This isn’t a minor price cut; it’s a structural shift. For example:

• A restaurant earning ₹1,00,000 via Swiggy might pay ₹20,000 in commission.
• Under Rapido’s model (say 10%), the same outlet would only pay ₹10,000—doubling net earnings from food delivery.

Such pricing relief is particularly attractive to small and medium-sized restaurants, which often operate on razor-thin margins and have little bargaining power on current platforms.

2. Flat Delivery Charges: Transparent and Predictable

In contrast to the dynamic delivery pricing models used by Swiggy and Zomato, Rapido is introducing a simple, transparent fee structure for consumers:

• ₹25 for orders below ₹400
• ₹50 for orders above ₹400

This eliminates the “hidden fees” effect many consumers face when the final checkout value significantly exceeds the menu price. Studies show that consumers currently pay an average of ₹46 more per dish on aggregator platforms due to packaging, delivery, and platform fees—an annual burden of ₹12,000 per household in metro cities.

Rapido’s model aims to bring clarity and trust back into pricing, which may resonate with budget-conscious consumers, especially those with average order values below ₹250—Rapido’s initial target demographic.

3. Strategic Restaurant Partnerships via NRAI

Crucially, Rapido isn’t going it alone. It has partnered with the National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI) to onboard smaller restaurants that have been vocal critics of Zomato and Swiggy’s pricing structures.

This move taps into a growing wave of dissatisfaction. Restaurateurs like Vandit Malik of The Garlic Bread have called aggregator platforms “unsustainable for small restaurant owners,” echoing the wider sentiment that current models favor large chains at the expense of independents.

In short, Rapido’s approach—lower commissions, fixed delivery fees, and strategic partnerships—targets the pain points that have plagued both restaurants and consumers in the current duopoly.

The Market Impact – Cracks in the Duopoly

The entry of Rapido into the food delivery business is more than just another startup launching a new service. It strikes at the foundation of the tightly held Zomato-Swiggy duopoly and brings fresh attention to systemic issues that have long gone unaddressed.

1. A Highly Concentrated Market Facing New Pressure

As of June 2025:

• Zomato (now rebranded as Eternal) commands a ₹1.95 trillion market capitalization.
• Swiggy, still privately held, is valued at around ₹933.75 billion.

Together, they control nearly 100% of India’s online food delivery traffic—Zomato with a 58% share, Swiggy with 42%. Such consolidation gives them enormous leverage over restaurant pricing, consumer fees, and platform policies.

But that dominance has also drawn scrutiny. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has already flagged potential market imbalances following formal complaints by the National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI). Among the concerns:

• Lack of choice for restaurants
• Allegedly biased algorithmic listings
• Non-transparent commission models
• Delayed settlements and payout inconsistencies

Rapido’s entry comes amid this brewing regulatory environment—well-timed to attract both attention and allies.

2. Breaking the Commission Trap

The commission war could be the wedge that opens up the market. For years, restaurants have quietly borne rising commission rates, complex add-on fees, and lack of negotiation power. Rapido’s 8–15% offer not only eases this burden but also creates competitive pressure on incumbents.

If Rapido succeeds in onboarding even a modest share of restaurants—especially those in tier-2 and tier-3 cities where it already has presence through its bike taxi and delivery network—it could spark a ripple effect:

• Restaurants may demand lower rates from Zomato and Swiggy.
• More aggregators could emerge with similar models.
• Policy-makers may accelerate calls for regulatory reforms.

3. A Better Deal for Consumers Too

Rapido is also targeting consumer fatigue. The average Indian food delivery customer unknowingly pays a substantial “aggregator premium”—estimated at ₹9,000 to ₹11,000 crore annually across India. This includes:

• Platform commissions built into menu prices
• Packaging charges
• Peak-time delivery fees
• Platform service fees

By introducing a flat and visible delivery fee, Rapido is betting on price transparency as a customer acquisition lever. If it works, price-sensitive users—particularly students, gig workers, and low-AOV households—could migrate.

Rapido’s model may still be untested at scale, but it has already exposed fractures in the existing food delivery economy—especially the overwhelming power imbalance between aggregators and small businesses.

Key Advantages – Why Rapido Has a Real Shot

While entering the food delivery business is notoriously tough, Rapido isn’t starting from scratch. The company brings a mix of operational readiness, ecosystem partnerships, and consumer alignment that could give it an edge where others—like Ola and Uber—have failed.

1. A Ready-Made Logistics Backbone

Unlike most new entrants, Rapido already operates a massive delivery fleet:

• Over 700,000 active riders across India
• 2.5 million daily orders, spanning bike taxis, auto rides, and peer-to-peer deliveries through Rapido Local

This existing logistics infrastructure gives it a cost advantage and scalability head start, especially in Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities where it already operates.

Most food delivery platforms spend heavily on building their last-mile network. Rapido, by contrast, can repurpose its existing riders, reducing both delivery cost and onboarding time during its Bengaluru pilot launch set for July 2025.

2. Solid Financial Backing

In a sector where deep pockets often determine longevity, Rapido recently raised ₹1,660 crore ($200 million) in Series E funding. With a $1.1 billion valuation, it officially entered India’s Unicorn Club.

Investors include:

• WestBridge Capital (lead investor)
• Nexus Venture Partners
• Think Investments
• Invus Opportunities (New York-based private equity)

This war chest gives Rapido the cushion it needs for:

• Customer acquisition campaigns
• Onboarding incentives for restaurants
• Technology and app enhancements
• Scaling delivery logistics with quality control

3. Focus on Underserved Segments

While Zomato and Swiggy increasingly cater to premium urban consumers, Rapido is doubling down on affordability:

• Targeting users with average order values (AOV) below ₹250
• Promoting transparency with flat fees and visible charges
• Prioritizing small and independent restaurants, rather than large chains

This focus aligns with broader market needs—especially in an economic climate where consumers and businesses are highly cost-sensitive.

4. Strong Alignment with Restaurant Bodies

Perhaps one of the most strategic moves is Rapido’s tie-up with the National Restaurant Association of India (NRAI). This allows it to:

• Tap into a ready pool of restaurants dissatisfied with incumbents
• Earn goodwill from regulatory stakeholders
• Position itself as a restaurant-first platform, in contrast to algorithm- and commission-driven models

By combining logistical strength, financial depth, consumer empathy, and restaurant-centricity, Rapido may be the first serious threat to the Zomato-Swiggy duopoly in years.

Challenges Ahead – Why Disruption Isn’t Easy

Despite its promising model, Rapido’s road into food delivery is far from smooth. The Indian market is as complex as it is competitive, and history has shown that even well-funded entrants can falter. Ola Café and Uber Eats are cautionary tales—both launched with big ambitions, only to exit after heavy losses and operational inefficiencies.

Here are the main hurdles Rapido must overcome:

1. Thin Margins and Heavy Burn Rates

Food delivery is a business of high logistics cost and low margins. Even Zomato and Swiggy, with years of experience and scale, struggle to stay profitable consistently.

Rapido’s low commission model (8–15%) and flat delivery fees (₹25–₹50) may appeal to users and restaurants, but it also means:

• Lower revenue per order
• Longer breakeven timelines
• High cash burn in early phases, especially during customer acquisition

Without careful cost management, Rapido could find itself in the same situation Ola did—burning through capital without building user loyalty or restaurant stickiness.

2. Operational Complexity and Scale Management

Delivering food is not the same as delivering people or parcels. Key operational challenges include:

• Maintaining food quality and temperature
• Coordinating accurate pick-up/drop-off timing
• Handling restaurant integration, POS systems, and order flow

Even one bad experience—late delivery, spilled food, or order mismatch—can cause churn in a hyper-competitive market.

While Rapido has a large fleet, transitioning from mobility to food logistics demands new SOPs, training modules, and support infrastructure.

3. Regulatory Pressure and Legal Hurdles

Rapido is already under regulatory scrutiny:

• In March 2025, the Delhi High Court warned the company over app accessibility issues and gave it four months to comply.
• In May 2025, the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) began probing both Ola and Rapido over advance tipping practices.

Any further compliance violations, especially related to food safety, labor rights, or rider compensation, could lead to legal entanglements or platform bans in key cities.

4. Consumer Habits and Brand Perception

While price matters, habit and trust often matter more.

• Zomato and Swiggy have spent years building brand loyalty, gamifying the user experience, and personalizing recommendations.
• Consumers are accustomed to their UX, loyalty programs (like Zomato Gold), and rapid refunds.

Rapido will need more than low prices—it must deliver consistent, delightful experiences to convert users and retain them. This could mean significant investments in tech, marketing, and support.

In summary, Rapido’s model addresses many structural problems in the food delivery space, but the execution risk is immense. Disrupting a duopoly isn’t just about undercutting prices—it’s about delivering on service, scale, and trust over the long term.

The Verdict – Is a Shake-Up Finally Coming?

The Indian food delivery landscape has long resembled a closed ring fight between just two contenders—Zomato and Swiggy. With massive funding, widespread brand recognition, and years of market fine-tuning, the duo has built what many see as an impenetrable duopoly.

But Rapido’s entry, powered by low commissions, transparent pricing, and an existing delivery fleet, could finally signal the first real challenge to this status quo.

1. Rapido’s Value Proposition Is Clear

• Restaurants get a significantly lower commission structure (8–15%), addressing the most painful friction point in the current ecosystem.
• Consumers get predictable, flat delivery fees, and potential relief from hidden costs and platform premiums.
• Small businesses—especially those priced out of Zomato and Swiggy—gain a possible path to profitability.

In a country where affordability drives scale, Rapido’s model could quickly find traction in price-sensitive Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities.

2. A Strategic Entry at the Right Time

Rapido is entering the market at a moment when:

• Regulatory bodies are actively investigating Zomato and Swiggy.
• Restaurant discontent is at an all-time high.
• Consumers are increasingly price-aware amid economic pressures.

Its pilot launch in Bengaluru (July 2025), in partnership with the National Restaurant Association of India, will serve as a test case. If successful, it could force incumbents to rethink pricing, improve service quality, and focus more on fairness and transparency.

3. But Execution Will Make or Break It

None of this guarantees success. Food delivery is brutal:

• Ola and Uber failed despite huge capital and reach.
• Rapido will have to prove that its commission-light, fee-simple model can scale sustainably without compromising service quality or bleeding capital.

If it can manage operational complexity, ensure rider reliability, and build consumer trust, Rapido could do what no one has managed in nearly a decade—break the Zomato-Swiggy stranglehold.

What Now for Zomato and Swiggy Shareholders?

For shareholders of Zomato (now rebranded as Eternal) and Swiggy, Rapido’s entry raises urgent questions—not just about competition, but about margin pressure, regulatory scrutiny, and long-term profitability in a tightening market.

1. Margin Pressure Could Impact Valuations

Both Swiggy and Zomato have built their businesses on double-digit commission models, ranging from 16% to 30%. If Rapido’s 8–15% structure gains traction among restaurants:

• Commission rates industry-wide may drop, forcing incumbents to renegotiate margins.
• Zomato and Swiggy could be pressured to reduce fees, impacting EBITDA margins and burn rates.
• This may weaken their growth-at-all-costs strategy, forcing a pivot toward sustainable unit economics.

For investors, this translates to a risk of downward earnings revisions and possible valuation corrections, especially if order volume slows in the face of better-priced competition.

2. Blinkit and Diversification Now Carry More Weight

Zomato shareholders may now lean more heavily on Blinkit’s quick commerce growth to balance any decline in food delivery profitability.

Zomato currently has a market capitalization of ₹1.95 trillion (as of June 2025), with Blinkit becoming a major driver of topline growth. But if food delivery—a core segment—starts underperforming, Blinkit must overdeliver to maintain investor confidence.

Swiggy, valued at ₹933.75 billion, is still private but gearing up for an IPO. If Rapido shows traction in key markets before Swiggy’s listing, it could spook institutional investors and force a revaluation or delay.

3. Institutional Concerns Over Regulatory Risk

Shareholders are increasingly alert to the regulatory tone in India’s food delivery market:

• The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has flagged duopolistic behavior from Zomato and Swiggy.
• The NRAI has publicly criticized their pricing structures, delivery fees, and lack of transparency.
• Rapido’s tie-up with NRAI and its focus on small businesses may earn regulatory goodwill—something Zomato and Swiggy must now work to rebuild.

Shareholders will need to watch for potential penalties, forced reforms, or compliance costs that could materially impact earnings outlooks.

4. The Risk of Restaurant Flight

Perhaps the biggest threat? Restaurants now have an alternative.

If enough restaurants choose Rapido for its lower commissions and predictable pricing:

• Order density on Zomato and Swiggy may fall, impacting delivery efficiency.
• Restaurants may delist or de-prioritize legacy platforms, reducing customer choice.
• This could trigger a self-reinforcing spiral: fewer restaurants → fewer users → lower investor confidence.

Investor Insight: Time to Reassess the Moat

For years, Zomato and Swiggy’s moats were built on:

• Network effects
• Exclusive restaurant partnerships
• Absence of viable competitors

Rapido’s entry chips away at all three. For shareholders, this isn’t cause for panic—but it is time for careful recalibration:

• Watch customer retention metrics
• Track restaurant acquisition and churn
• Monitor cash burn and margin trends

If Rapido gains even 10–15% market share in key cities, it could erode long-term shareholder value unless incumbents adjust quickly.

Final Take: Rapido vs Zomato Swiggy – The Battle Has Begun

In the high-stakes game of Indian food delivery, Rapido vs Zomato Swiggy is shaping up to be a battle worth watching.

Zomato and Swiggy may still hold the lion’s share of the market, but the rules of the game are changing. With low commissions, a focus on small restaurants, and transparent customer pricing, Rapido is pushing the incumbents to adapt—or risk being outflanked.

Whether it wins or not, Rapido is already doing one thing right: forcing a long-overdue conversation on fairness, sustainability, and choice in Indian food delivery.

Ready to see if Rapido can truly shake up the food delivery giants? Dive into the battle of Rapido vs Zomato Swiggy now!

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

Q1: What makes Rapido’s commission model different from Zomato and Swiggy?
A1: Rapido charges restaurants a significantly lower commission of 8–15%, compared to Zomato and Swiggy’s 16–30%, aiming to ease the financial burden on small and medium restaurants.

Q2: How does Rapido’s delivery fee compare to the existing platforms?
A2: Rapido uses a simple flat delivery fee—₹25 for orders below ₹400 and ₹50 for orders above ₹400—offering transparency and predictability for customers.

Q3: Can Rapido disrupt the dominance of Zomato and Swiggy in India’s food delivery market?
A3: While Rapido’s low commission and pricing model presents a strong challenge, success depends on its ability to scale operations, maintain service quality, and win consumer trust.

Q4: Why is the food delivery commission such a big deal for restaurants?
A4: High commissions from Zomato and Swiggy significantly reduce profit margins, especially for small restaurants that rely heavily on delivery for daily revenue.

Q5: What impact does Rapido’s entry have on Zomato and Swiggy shareholders?
A5: Rapido’s competitive pricing may pressure margins, impact growth forecasts, and lead to increased regulatory scrutiny, forcing shareholders to reassess long-term profitability.

Related Articles

India’s Rare Earth Magnet Mission: A New Frontier for Investors